Wednesday, 29 December 2021

FILMS OF 2021: DUNE PART ONE

 DUNE

So, that's Dune done. Saw it last night. A film I've been aching to see for a year.
I've listened to the audible book, rewatched the Lynch version in anticipation.
It's a long film, a deeply serious film, with a great cast, great acting, a well-written script, it adapts the book extremely well, the space ships and set designs and all that are glorious. I admired it's scope, its languid pace, the acting and all that, BUT...
Why the hell did it all have to be shot in sepia? Just a sea of orange and browns, everything looked so murky and gloomy.
Several years ago, there was a depressing trend for shaky cam and violent editing in action films, then we had that fad for never having a static camera, as if every movie was a fly on the wall documentary and now it seems we can't have a science fiction film unless it's gloomy, murky and bleached of colour.
You, or should I say 'one', can't help but compare it with the flawed 1984 Lynch version and realise how much he got right. His film, the part that works is, what we get here, Paul and his family arriving on Dune and ending up with the Fremen. The difference here is that rather than shoehorn all that into a single hour, Denis Villeneuve has 155 minutes to do the same.
Apart from that, the film is exactly what I wanted. But be warned you have to invest in it, my son feels you need to have read the book to fully understand it and judging by the number of walk outs, mostly from people with kids, and teenagers, he might have a point.
And even though Denis The Vill-nace has 155 minutes, it still feels as if he's rushed some of this, particularly in setting up Paul and the abilities his mother has given him.
This is another meaty, solid 'hard' science fiction film and I look forward to watching it again, although next time, probably at home, with the brightness and contrast turned up high.
8/10

FILMS OF 2021: THE FRENCH DESPATCH

The French Despatch

Wes Anderson's latest.

What a triumph, visually, stylistically and story wise. A visual feast, a delightful slice of whimsy and silliness, went as a family and we all adored it.
It looks superb, lovely vibrant colours, I never thought I'd ever seen another film that looked bright again. Mixing black and white with colour in a series of stories all highlighting stories written for a fictitious American magazine, the French Despatch of the title published in France, ranging from teenage rebellion, deranged artists and police chefs. The film takes the stories from the last issue published after the death of its editor, played by Bill Murray.
With a fantastic cast ranging from the usual Anderson stalwarts like Bill Murray, William Defoe, Owen Wilson and Jason Schwartzman and also featuring the likes of: Benicio del Toro, Adrien Brody, Tilda Swinton, Léa Seydoux, Frances McDormand, Timothée Chalamet, Lyna Khoudri, Jeffrey Wright, Mathieu Amalric and Stephen Park.
There are three main stories, the first concerns a suicidal homicidal artist, del Toro, his muse and prison guard Léa Seydoux and the efforts of art dealer, Adrien Brody to get him out of prison. The second sees reporter Frances McDormand become emotionally involved in a student uprising lead by chess protege Timothée Chalamet, and the third sees Jeffrey Wright discovering the joys of a detective eating club and helping to rescue a kidnapped boy. All bookended by the brilliant Bill Murray playing the editor of the magazine each of these stories appeared in.
As with every Anderson movie, the music plays an important part and the soundtrack for this was no exception. Indeed I would have to say that I loved everything about this film. It's funny, touching and insanely quirky. Everyone involves seems to be enjoying themselves and the richness and depth of the film was a delight. Anderson's meticulous attention to background detail and the framing of each and every shot enriches this film.
But be warned, this is a film unlike any other, no one else makes films like Anderson.
If I had one quibble, it would be that as Wes Anderson develops he becomes perhaps too obsessed with style and although I loved this film, it wasn't as brilliantly written as say Rushmore or The Royal Tennabaums.
Still, this was a delight from beginning to end.
9/10

FILMS OF 2021: FINCH

FINCH 

It's a post apocalyptic movie set in a world ravaged by a cataclysmic solar flare that has destroyed the ozone layer and burned the planet. The cast consists of 1. Tom Hanks. 2. A robot. 3. A dog.

Nothing dramatic really happens, there's no threat, no violence, no big danger. Just a man travelling across country in his RV teaching his robot how to live in the world once he's dead and how to look after his dog. At one point a car follows them, I won't spoil what happens...
And I bloody loved it. Heart warming, moving and gentle. Just what I need. it won't be for everyone, but I've reached a point in my life where I like gentle things, like this and Gone Fishing, or The Detectorists. I'm hoping tonight's cinema offering of Last Night in Soho will continue the trend.
Tom Hanks, as ever, brings such a warmth and sweetness to a role. The robot, brilliantly CGI-ed using motion-capture was played by Caleb Landry Jones and is the classic trope of a child-like artifical intelligence learning what it means to be human. Directed by Miguel Sapochnik.
8/10

THE FILMS OF 2021: THE ETERNALS

The Eternals.

This sees a bunch of super-heroes, originally created by Jack Kirby, battling a planet-endangering threat of such epic proportions as to beggar belief, and boy I thought Dr Gnu has problems.
It turns out that ten insanely powerful Eternals are an immortal bunch of guardians sent to Earth 7000 years ago to protect mankind from another group of intergalactic villainy called the Deviants. The Eternals hunt down and kill them with glee until all of them are dead. However in the present, the Deviants return and start targeting the Eternals for some reason which becomes apparent over the long running time of the movie until the 3rd act and a gigantic showdown that leaves you reeling with questions.
The Eternals from planet Olympia are lead by Salma Hayek are the product of a group of beings known as the Celestials who are as old as the universe.
Anyway, over the past 7K years, the Eternals, very much like ABBA have fallen in and out of love with each other, gotten married to each other, before turning their back on each other. Now it's time to get the band back together for one last reunion tour. And so Serei, played by Gemma Chan sets out to find them all to stop whatever it is that's going on. We get to see the whole back story of the Eternals time on Earth as well as what they've all be doing in the intervening seven thousand years.
This looks good, it's big, it's epic but it's also a case of WTF. I found I just did not care about any of it. The threat is too big, the superheroes are just so otherworldly that I couldn't care less about them. Each has a power, some range from plain stupid (shooting marble shaped balls of energy out of their finger tips) to hyper speed to, basically superman, oh and they're all immortal until the point when they have to die to propel the plot. The powers are ill-defined and vary depending on what's required. The repetitive fights see the Eternals battle the four-legged Deviants who get stronger each time they kill an Eternal and so you can play the game of guessing who's going to die next, or why, or you can just sit there and watch it all, unengaged and uninvolved, like I was. However, my son, really enjoyed it and dismissed my whinging as that of an old man.
Didn't hate it, it's far better than Venon, the final 'big boss' showdown was unique and it does have some good moments.
But I wish for those glory days when the villain's arch plan was to sink California and clean up on real estate.
7/10
P.S.
Cos this sort of thing matters. There are TWO closing credit stings, one after the first batch and the other right at the very, very end. One of them is going to make a lot of people very angry, I'm guessing.

FILMS OF 2021: RED NOTICE

RED NOTICE
Netflix's most expensive film, so far. Starring Deadpool, Wonder Woman and The Rock. Written and directed by the man who also brought us Skyscraper and Central Intelligence, both starring the Rock, oh and Dodgeball, which was good.
I am 35 minutes into and here are my initial thoughts.
Generic, bland, and so limp you keep wanting to check its pulse in case it's died. Even the title is generic.
The plot so far, The Rock is a FBI Profiler hunting Deadpool who's an international jewel thief and Wonder Woman who's another international jewel thief, who's framed them both. Together they're all after Cleopatra's three eggs, apparently given to her by Mark Anthony as a wedding gift. Anyway what follows is a generic globe-hop around the from Rome to Bali to a Russian black op prison as they search for the eggs which an international arms dealer and billionaire is willing to pay 300 million dollars for as a wedding gift for his daughter. And while it runs I'm writing this, that's how engaged I am by it.
Deadpool quips, The Rock pouts, and Wonder Woman raises an eyebrown, that the level of acting each actor is committing too. The chase and fight scenes are so bland you can hear them count between each punch, run or jump.
"Can you fly a helicopter?" Asks the Rock.
"Does the back of your head look like a huge penis?" quips back Deadpool.
At one point, Deadpool disarms a prison guard with a snowball.
Much stuff ensues.
As several people have pointed out, there is literally nothing in it worth getting het up about it. This film is perfectly adequate.
I could comment about the plot holes, the contrivances, the generic nature of the whole thing, the rote, by-the-numbers plot, the lack of suspense, drama, action or even adventure, but what's the bloody point? It's a generic family friendly action romp with no nudity, consequence-free-violence and no swearing, it's got just enough jokes for the adults (see above) and it doesn't outstay its welcome.
You come for the fact it's got The Rock, Wonder Woman and Dead Pool in it and you'll stay cos it doesn't rock the boat.
Blandness thy name is Red Notice.

It is Meh perfection. 5/10 

FILMS OF 2021 #2: DIE HARD, IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE & SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME

Die Hard (1988)
Many people claim that this is a Christmas movie, and yet I say no it isn't. Just cos it's set at Christmas doesn't mean it's a Christmas movie.
It's the film that made Bruce Willis, introduced the world to Alan Rickman and cemented John McTiernan as one of the best action directors.
The plot sees a group of Euro-trash terrorists hi-jack an office Christmas Party on Christmas Eve as a cover for stealing 600 million dollars worth of bearer bonds, not realising that one of the guests is actually a NYPD cop called John McClane.
I've always loved this movie, and yet not seen it on the big screen in probably 20 odd years. Revisiting this, Elf and It's a Wonderful Life on the big screen again has been a delightful experience, films need to be seen on the big screen. I've watched Die Hard countless times on VHS, DVD and Blu-Ray but it's only watching it on the big screen that you can utterly lose yourself in the movie, you seen things you miss on a small screen. Willis cared back then and it shows, Rickman loses himself in his breakout role as the leader of the gang of ex-terrorists, Hans Gruber and the movie gave Robert Davi a brief golden period in his career, leading to the role of the villain, Franz Sanchez, in the Bond film Licence to Kill.
This is a glorious action film that has no need for shaky cam or frenzied editing to convey drama, it's got an endlessly quotable script and it's well plotted and has no flabby centre, the way it sets up the scenario and introduces the villains is a masterclass in plotting. That coupled with good practical effects, some nifty compositing and a 15 cert for bloody violence, plus bare breasts makes it one of my top ten favourite films!
10/10

IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE
A one word review - Wonderful!
Just wonderful. Beautifully written, great direction and a superb performance by James Stewart. I just love this film. It's one of my four favourite Christmas movies along with A Christmas Story, Scrooge (1951) and Bad Santa and Die Hard, which I'm seeing tomorrow (yes I know that's five).
Produced and directed by Frank Capra, it always amazes me to realise that on its release this film flopped, and only became a Christmas stapple when first shown on American TVs in the 50s.
Seeing this restored version of IAWL on the big screen means you get to see things you probably missed if you've only watched it on a TV, count how many rooms the drawing of George lassoing the moon turns up for example. Stewart is brilliant as George Bailey, the richest man in town. He portrays Bailey from the age of approximately 20 to late 40s and without the need for elaborate make up. He is the prototype Tom Hanks and it's on his performance that the whole film swings. That's to take nothing away from the supporting cast, lead by the Donna Reed, who all give this film its huge heart and character.
The story sees George Bailey, a man who sacrifices his own dreams and ambitions for the greater good of Bedford Falls, who when, through no fault of his own, faces financial ruin and imprisonment decides to kill himself. He is saved by a trainee angel who grants him his wish of never having been born and discovers just how much his life has touched the lives of so many others.
For a film that's nearly 75 years old to be this captivating, this engrossing and this magical is a pure triumph. As a callow art school youth I scoffed at this and Singing in the Rain, believing them to be old and fuddy-duddy, despite the fact I'd never actually watched them. And in both cases I stumbled across them whilst watching tv, I came in half-way through in both cases and was captivated by both and I love them to this day.
This film lifts my spirit and makes me feel deeply moved and I bloody love it without reserve.
The perfect Christmas movie and one of my actual Top Ten Movies of all times.

10/10

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME
What fun! Simply the best Marvel movie since Endgame.
Despite a somewhat flabby centre this film was a delight, mixing hi-jinx, humour, adventure and action with aplomb. It's no surprise to reveal the return of Dr Oct and the other villains from the past, but that's all I'm giving away.
There were sequences that had the audience gasping in delight and surprise and this film managed to be deeply moving, in two scene in particular, one of which had me chocking back the tears.
Last month's Ghostbusters, followed the Star Wars sequel playbook, and was happy to just recycle everything from its back catalogue, down to repeating actual storybeats, dialogue and action in the most obscene fan-serving fashion.
However, Spider-Man: No Way Home, despite bringing back characters from the previous seven films and featuring a guest character appearance by Dr. Strange, managed to do it all without a sense of fan-servicing.
The story in a nutshell see Peter Parker outed as Spider-Man and forced to ask Dr. Strange to cast a spell that will make everyone forget he's the webslinger, Parker not Strange. I mean why would Parker ask Strange to make the world forget Strange was Spider-man, when he's Strange not Spider-Man, no that would be strange.
Anyway, thanks to Parker, Strange balls it up and the worlds of the past seven Spider-Man movies collide in the most unexpected way and the multiverse is unleashed.
It's great to see Alfred Molina, Willem Defoe, Hayden Church, Jamie Foxx and others back, and Dr. Oct in particular is given a very satisfying story arc, revealing that Molina has a good sense of humour.
It's long, but it's also fun and Tom Holland, Zendaya, Morisa Tomei, in particular are fantastic. Okay so perhaps some of the dialogue is a tad shonky at times, but there is a lot of exposition to get across, but so what! What gives this film heart is Spider-Man, and we're gleefully reminded of just how fantastic he is and was in some truly delightful and surprising ways.
You don't need to have seen the past movies to enjoy this. What a great way to start the end of the year!
8/10

ALL THE FILMS OF 2021 (IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER) #1 F&F9, KING'S MAN, THE MATRIX: RESUSCITATIONS

Well, 2021 is almost over and I went to the cinema over 45 times and watched 37 movies. These are some of the films i sat through, some good some bad.

FAST AND FURIOUS 9
Last night I went to the cinema and watched the worst film of the year. It didn't cost me much, just three hours of my life that I will never get back.

The funny thing was I thought I'd already seen the worst film of the year the previous night when I stupidly went to see Monster Hunter. But by comparison that was Citizen Kane.

Indeed not only was last night's film, without doubt, the worst film of the year, it might also be one of the worst films of the decade and the worst thing to happen to the world since Covid.
I'm talking about FAST AND FURIOUS 9 (you're furious I'm bloody livid).

Before I start my rant I have to say that I really enjoyed F&F 5, 6 and 7.

This new outing was a film I TRULY, TRULY LOATHED. One that was so ugly, so empty, so vacuous, so utterly without merit, so mind- numbingly tedious that it went from bad to 'so-bad-it's-good', to - oh my god this is shit, to 'I want to die', to 'please someone kill me!' to finally "zzzzzzzzzz." when I at all dozed off during the climatic fight.

And god is it boring. Boring, boring, boring. Bo-ring.

It is one of the laziest films I have ever seen. The plot is risible, it is a film with no dialogue at all - just a series of one-liners and I don't mean jokes, I mean motivational poster sayings - "we are family." "shit just got real." that sort of thing.

The effects aren't that great, the stunts are rendered meaningless by CGI and the plot holes are so VAST you could skid an articulated lorry sideways through them. The lack of physics, which in the past was kind of fun, is in this outing an actual insult to the audience's intelligence.

Old, apparently much loved, characters return from the dead. New characters are introduced and given vast back stories, and the main plot Mcguffin is pure piss.

It occurred to me that the F&F franchise uses James Bond as its template, but instead of character, plot, drama, globe-trotting and adventure they just have cars. At least in a Bond film you get sex. In this franchise, sex would probably focus on Wim Weasel looking lovingly up the exhaust pipe of his Dodge Charger while rubbing his crotch and drooling a little.

Vin Disel playing the hard-boiled-egg-headed super hero lead, Dominic Toretto, is thankfully absent for large swaths of this film, which I think is a blessed relief. He barely mumbles a word through most of it. Luckily the film makers (I suppose someone must have made this, I know it took five people to write it) lets the audience know how its hard-boiled-egg-headed super hero lead is thinking and feeling by changing the colour of his vest, or having him put on or take off his leather jacket. Oh and pouting while squinting.

It's not all a huge bag of shit tied up with string and run over by a truck carrying rancid piss to a vomiting convention, there is Tyrese Gibson playing Roman who brings some real humour to the proceedings with his character's realisation that he's in a movie and therefore invincible.
Nothing in this film makes any sense. For example. The science, the plot (or lack of one), the action or everything else.

Some things that bugged me.
When did this bunch of car thieves become super spies? Why are they sent on missions into South American countries to rescue CIA operatives, were all the other CIA agents busy? Why is our band of plucky heroes' secret base such an open secret? Why didn't the villain, when he has our bland of heroes utterly surrounded by 50 armed men kill them? Who is looking after Dominic's son while he's racing off around the world? And what about the appalling collateral damage in this film? If you thought the tank slaughter of F&F 6 was a bit much, you ain't seen nothing yet!

Now, a bit of investigation shows that this film has made over $300 million worldwide, scored a 62% on Rotten Tomato and even garnished a four star review from The Guardian. So just ignore me. I clearly know jack shit about movies.

2/10 (thanks to Tyrese Gibson)

King's Man (2021)
Co-written and directed by Matthew Vaughn and starring: Ralph Fiennes, Gemma Arterton, Rhys Ifans, Matthew Goode, Tom Hollander, Harris Dickinson, Daniel Brühl, Djimon Hounsou and Charles Dance.
And only 131 minutes long! That's only two hours and 11 minutes, which is short for a modern film. Shame it felt longer.
A great cast, great looking, some great action sequences and a shocking end to the 2nd act, but sadly overwhelmingly flat. It just doesn't engage. Ralph Fiennes carries the film, almost single-handily and the trailer miss-leads you into thinking this film is about the setting up of Kingsmen. It's not that, it's actually the world's longest prologue.
The plot sees the entire first world war and its causes carefully woven together into a complex plot that sees the whole real-life saga, manipulated by one single person, an unseen, shaven-headed, thick-Glaswegian sounding Bloefeld wannabe. Together with his gang of five, real-life villains to help him including Mata Hari, and Rasputin, played by a scene-stealing Rhys Ifans who's hands-down the best thing in this film.
This isn't a terrible film, it's far more enjoyable than Matrix: Resuscitation, although not nearly as good as Spider-Man NWH, it's just doesn't entirely work. Perhaps it's too po-faced, too earnest, too serious. It's hands down better than the dreadful second Kingsmen movie, but it's in need of a major injection of some much-needed humour.
7/10

The Matrix: Resuscitations
Oh boy, thought Hollywood it's been 18 years since we last plundered the legend of The Matrix, I'm sure everyone's forgotten our last two efforts, let's try again!
And off they went, recruiting Lana Wachowski, but not her sister, and all of the original cast, except for Fishbourne and Weaving, who clearly got a sense of 'one trip too many to the well'.
Because Matrix: Resuscitations is the perfect movie for Christmas time, since it's a Grade A turkey!
It doesn't start out as such, it's actually rather intriguing and you find yourself swept up by a giddy, relentless and frenzied set up, with new characters, a new Morpheus and an older Carrie-Anne Moss and Keanu Reeves, all running around and fighting and referencing the original at every opportunity. And then the plot kicks in.
Which, as far as I could fathom, sees Keanu reprising his role of Thomas Anderson, who is creator of the smash hit video game trilogy called The Matrix. At some point in the past he suffered a nervous breakdown and tried to jump off the roof of a building to prove he could fly and as a result he's had to spend the rest of his life in therapy with Doogie Howser, Neil Patrick Harris, and his black cat. Harris is keeping our plucky hero doped up on blue pills. Meanwhile, there's this female character called Bunny, who has a rabbit tattoo, and someone else claiming to be Morpheus belting about in the Matrix and fighting Agents and trying to find Neo. Back in Earth, Anderson keeps bumping into a woman who looks like Trinity but who's called Tiffany, and Morpheus keeps trying to pull or push him through mirrors. It turns out that both Neo and Trinity are dead, but if that's true then who is Tiffany and Anderson? Look I don't know, I watch these films and usually I have a good handle on what's going on, but this one, sort of just became so mind-bogglingly complicated that I just sort of stopped trying to keep track and just switched my brain to neutral and smiled my way through the rest of it.
All the recent sequels/reboots/prequels movies have followed the model of fan-service movies, shoehorning in lots of your favourite bits from the previous movies. The Matrix: Resuscitations, comes up with some altogether radical and completely new, by actually reusing literal snippets from the previous films, so you don't have to try and remember what's being referenced.
As well as old clips reused, old characters return, all of whom have to give vast and lengthy speeches to propel the plot along and the film soon falls into the following formula – ACTION! EXPOSITION. ACTION! EXPOSITION. And every time one of these characters turn up, the action stops and chat is given. There is one incredibly lengthy action sequence that just goes on and on and on and has so much collateral damage that you start hoping the robots win.
Similarly, the villain of the film is also multi-layered and unfathomably complex and I'm not entirely sure who the villain actually was, nor who they were fighting for.
Look, fuck it. I saw it last night, it was a complicated, mindbogglingly, visual cacophony of mayhem that ultimately just became a protracted punch-up punctuated by copious gun play. It had Keanu in it. Moss was good, as before, and some of the action was fun.
However it's long, 2 and a half hours and it even has a post credit sequence that really isn't worth waiting for and it just felt staggeringly pointless and utterly unnecessary. The first Matrix was a modern classic, they should have stopped there. But at least it's not as bad as the last one.
5/10